Emre Sokullu

Blog

16 July 2025

Comparing P2P.org, Kiln, and Figment: Which Staking-as-a-Service Provider is Right for You?

In the world of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchains, staking-as-a-service (STaaS) providers like P2P.org, Kiln, and Figment make it easy for users to stake assets and earn rewards without running their own validator nodes. These platforms cater to both institutional and retail users, offering non-custodial staking, liquid staking options, and developer tools. But how do they stack up? This blog post compares P2P.org, Kiln, and Figment across key metrics like market share, features, fees, security, and integrations to help you choose the best provider for your staking needs.

What Are P2P.org, Kiln, and Figment?

Market Share and Scale

Ethereum Staking

Other Networks

Features and Services

Feature P2P.org Kiln Figment
Supported Chains 50+ (Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, etc.) 10+ (Ethereum, Solana, TON, etc.) Ethereum, Solana, Cosmos, and others
Staking Type Non-custodial, liquid staking (Lido, Jito) Non-custodial, white-label, pooled staking Non-custodial, liquid staking (Liquid Collective)
Liquid Staking Yes, via Lido and others Yes, via Liquid Collective (LsETH) Yes, via Liquid Collective and JitoSOL
White-Label Solutions Yes, for custodians/exchanges Yes, API-first for wallets/custodians Limited, focused on DataHub
Developer Tools DataHub for governance and data Unified API, Kiln Dashboard DataHub for governance and data
Minimum Staking No minimum for some protocols Flexible, no minimum for pooled staking No minimum for liquid staking
DeFi Integration Supports DeFi yields (e.g., stETH) Supports DeFi yields (e.g., stETH) Supports DeFi yields (LsETH, JitoSOL)

Fees and Reward Structure

Community Note: On platforms like X, Kiln is praised for fee transparency, while Figment users appreciate custom withdrawal addresses but criticize unclear fee structures.

Security and Reliability

Integrations and Partnerships

User Experience and Accessibility

Which Provider Should You Choose?

Final Thoughts

For Ethereum staking, Figment and Kiln dominate with ~61% combined market share, while P2P.org shines within Lido’s ecosystem. For Solana or other chains, Figment and P2P.org offer broader support, with Kiln catching up. Kiln stands out for transparency and institutional features, Figment for market share and liquid staking, and P2P.org for multi-chain flexibility and developer tools. Your choice depends on your priorities—whether it’s fees, chain support, or institutional-grade solutions.

Ready to stake? Check out P2P.org, Kiln, or Figment to get started.

Sources:

tags: